SOURCE: Click here to read the full original post

NEO has often been likened to “The Chinese Ethereum,” and for good reason. The platform, among other things, similarly runs smart contracts and decentralized applications. However, in order to stay in business in the world’s strictest regulatory environment, NEO has to play by the rules — which has pushed the project to the top of China’s blockchain foodchain.

Playing by the Rules

In an interview with The Hong Kong Economic Journal, NEO founder Da Hong-fei did not deny the similarities between his platform — the tenth largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization — and Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization.

Da did, however, note that NEO’s focus is firmly on staying compliant with regulations in arguably the world’s most restrictive cryptocurrency market. As such, Da claims NEO has more application than its primary competitor. He stated:

One of the biggest differences [between NEO and Ethereum] is NEO’s focus on using blockchain and other new technologies to serve the real economy.

That said, Da did admit that regulatory compliance means less anonymity. However, the trade-off is that transparency with regulators allows for smoother business relations with traditional companies and governments — which increases the project’s chances for greater success.

Furthermore, Da noted that the crackdown in China has been good for both NEO and the country’s cryptocurrency space as a whole, as it has all but destroyed fraudulent activity in the country’s market while leaving NEO in a prime position of power.

Only the Strong Will Survive

The cryptocurrency market has always experienced extreme volatility, and 2018 has proven no different. The total market capitalization of the cryptocurrency market fell from $830 billion in early January to below $250 billion by early April — and NEO has not remained unaffected.

During that same time, NEO dropped from just over $190 to just below $45. Still, Da says it’s nothing to worry about, as it’s all just par for the course. He explained:

It reminds me of the similar correction in 2013, when bitcoin

SourceBitcoinist.net - click here to read the rest of this article